[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#576274: Possible Bug Fix?



Good Morning,

I've been working on this bug for the last 3 days and think I've isolated and corrected the problem. Intel provides special (open source) linux drivers for their video cards at this url: http://intellinuxgraphics.org/index.html

After looking over the site for awhile and attempting to install them I found that most were just updates to what we had already (pending upstream). So I went back into XOrg.conf to look through and try to see if perhaps the system was misconfigured.

This is what I saw:
-------------------------------
Section "Device"
   Identifier    "Configured Video Device"
   Option        "UseFBDev"        "true"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
   Identifier    "Configured Monitor"
EndSection
-------------------------------

I personally find it uneasy when all it tells me is that its "configured" so I went through the repositories to confirm I had the right driver packages and autoconfigs to attempt to "refresh" the conf file so to speak.

I installed/reinstalled the following packages: mesa-utils (7.0.3-7), xdebconfigurator (1.35), xserver-xorg (1:7.3+20), xserver-xorg-core (2:1.4.2-10.lenny3), xserver-xorg-video-dummy (1:0.3.0-1), xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.3.2-2+lenny8)

Then I ran 'xdebconfigurator', after it completed I got curious as to the changes it made so I went back to XOrg.conf to see, the following was changed:
----------------------------
Section "Device"
   Identifier    "Configured Video Device"
   Driver        "i810"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"
   Identifier    "Configured Monitor"
EndSection
----------------------------

Its evidently using the i810 Intel drivers now. Though I have a 945GM card I dont know if there is a driver for that card specifically, or if it would make a difference.


I've been runing my system for 3 days now without interruption. Can someone else replicate these steps on an affected system to see if it fixes it? I might have just had a different problem...




Reply to: