[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#598144: rt2500pci: very low transfers and link quality



Hi again,

I need to compile the graphics card drivers (Nvidia) and I can't find headers for 2.6.35 kernel in the repository (deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental main).

Instead, I install linux-image-2.6.36-rc5-686, that has header packages available, but I can't install header packages because a dependency error:

# aptitude -t experimental install linux-headers-2.6.36-rc5-686
Se instalarán los siguiente paquetes NUEVOS:    
  linux-headers-2.6.36-rc5-686{b} linux-headers-2.6.36-rc5-common{a}
0 paquetes actualizados, 2 nuevos instalados, 0 para eliminar y 230 sin actualizar.
Necesito descargar 4691kB de ficheros. Después de desempaquetar se usarán 29,9MB.
No se satisfacen las dependencias de los siguientes paquetes:
  linux-headers-2.6.36-rc5-686: Depende: linux-kbuild-2.6.36 que es un paquete virtual.
Las acciones siguientes resolverán estas dependencias

     Mantener los paquetes siguientes en la versión actual:
1)     linux-headers-2.6.36-rc5-686 [Sin instalar]        



¿Acepta esta solución? [Y/n/q/?]



what can I do??




El 26 de septiembre de 2010 22:50, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> escribió:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 22:33 +0200, David Sánchez Herrero wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-20
> Severity: important
> File: rt2500pci
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been using rt2500pci since rt2500 legacy drivers source package
> dissapeared from the repository, and I have had this problems from the first
> time until now. The legacy drivers worked fine, but with the new ones I have
> very low transfers and poor link quality. I thought this problem was solved,
> but for me still exists.

Please test Linux 2.6.35 as packaged in experimental.  If this isn't any
better, please send a bug report to linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org and
cc the bug address 598144@bugs.debian.org .

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


Reply to: