Bug#534444: Acknowledgement (linux-image-2.6.26-2-486: CBQ broken)

[Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>]

tags 534444 moreinfo
thanks

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:08:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 16:42 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > Additional information.
> > 
> > It does not do it on all classes. I can observe it on a particular class
> > parented to the root CBQ qdisc with multiple burstable children. 
> > 
> > "isolated" put on another class parented to the root qdisc is similarly
> > ignored. 
> > 
> > I will try to dig through the source to see exactly where the bug is,
> > but it is definitely a bug (the results of tc are confirmed by delay
> > measurements and bandwidth measurements in the relevant classes).
> 
> Please also test whether the configuration you're trying is still broken
> in kernel version 2.6.30 (from unstable).  If so, please report this bug
> upstream on bugzilla.kernel.org.

Anton,
does still occur with current kernels? Did you report it in the kernel.org
bugzilla?

Cheers,
        Moritz