Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #571242 (http://bugs.debian.org/571242)
> # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15426
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 571242 + status-NEW
Bug#571242: linux-image-2.6.32-2-amd64: running 8 copies of bonnie deadlocks(?) in sync
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> # remote status report for #571459 (http://bugs.debian.org/571459)
> # * http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15440
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
> forwarded 571459 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15427, merged-upstream: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15440
Bug #571459 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-2-686: Mount as empty a smb alfresco share, but 2.6.30 do it fine
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15427, merged-upstream: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15440' from 'http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15427'
> usertags 571459 + status-ASSIGNED
Bug#571459: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686: Mount as empty a smb alfresco share, but 2.6.30 do it fine
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-ASSIGNED.
> # remote status report for #571457 (http://bugs.debian.org/571457)
> # * http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443
> # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW
> usertags 571457 + status-NEW
Bug#571457: OpenVZ write system call to TCP/IP connection hangs, burning CPU cycles endlessly.
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-NEW.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Reply to: