[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#510439: marked as done (linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl4965)

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:22:08 +0100
with message-id <20100301222208.GA3644@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl4965
has caused the Debian Bug report #510439,
regarding linux-image-2.6-amd64: page allocation failure for iwl4965
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
510439: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510439
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
Version: 2.6.26+17
Severity: normal

Doing 'ifconfig wlan0 up', where wlan0 is an iwl4965 interface
sometimes causes an allocation failure. 

I don't see a clear pattern in the occurences. Once the problem has
occured the interface is unusable, even if the module is
unloaded/reloaded.

The system is a Thinkpad T61 (Intel Core 2 Duo).

Trace:
firmware: requesting iwlwifi-4965-1.ucode
ifconfig: page allocation failure. order:5, mode:0x24
Pid: 12699, comm: ifconfig Not tainted 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff80276b1e>] __alloc_pages_internal+0x3a6/0x3bf
 [<ffffffff80211389>] dma_alloc_coherent+0xc1/0x24c
 [<ffffffffa02fd240>] :iwl4965:iwl4965_tx_queue_init+0x60/0x1cc
 [<ffffffffa03034f8>] :iwl4965:iwl4965_hw_nic_init+0x79e/0xa8a
 [<ffffffffa02f70be>] :iwl4965:__iwl4965_up+0xd2/0x1e5
 [<ffffffffa02f7636>] :iwl4965:iwl4965_mac_start+0x465/0x5cb
 [<ffffffff802a1c61>] do_lookup+0xf2/0x1c1
 [<ffffffff80273061>] filemap_fault+0x1c2/0x33d
 [<ffffffffa029d10d>] :mac80211:ieee80211_open+0x1ef/0x4d6
 [<ffffffff803bc80c>] dev_open+0x6c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff803bb3b4>] dev_change_flags+0xa6/0x15c
 [<ffffffff803fd9a9>] devinet_ioctl+0x242/0x59d
 [<ffffffff802a4f1a>] __user_walk_fd+0x41/0x4c
 [<ffffffff803af537>] sock_ioctl+0x1d4/0x1f8
 [<ffffffff802a6621>] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x6b
 [<ffffffff802a68b3>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x248/0x261
 [<ffffffff802993a1>] fd_install+0x25/0x56
 [<ffffffff802a691d>] sys_ioctl+0x51/0x70
 [<ffffffff8020beca>] system_call_after_swapgs+0x8a/0x8f

Mem-info:
Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
CPU    1: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
CPU    0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:  59
CPU    1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd:   0
Active:93775 inactive:385216 dirty:20895 writeback:31 unstable:0
 free:7487 slab:18157 mapped:13680 pagetables:1398 bounce:0
Node 0 DMA free:8032kB min:28kB low:32kB high:40kB active:1536kB inactive:0kB present:10772kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 1987 1987 1987
Node 0 DMA32 free:21916kB min:5688kB low:7108kB high:8532kB active:373564kB inactive:1540864kB present:2034832kB pages_scanned:167 all_unreclaimable? no
lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
Node 0 DMA: 116*4kB 79*8kB 26*16kB 12*32kB 4*64kB 4*128kB 3*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 1*4096kB = 8040kB
Node 0 DMA32: 3547*4kB 553*8kB 142*16kB 23*32kB 3*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 21940kB
400146 total pagecache pages
Swap cache: add 59, delete 59, find 0/0
Free swap  = 6139664kB
Total swap = 6139896kB
519856 pages of RAM
8380 reserved pages
411034 pages shared
1 pages swap cached
iwl4965: Tx 10 queue init failed
iwl4965: Unable to init nic
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:03:00.0 disabled
iwl4965: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN driver for Linux, 1.2.26ks
iwl4965: Copyright(c) 2003-2008 Intel Corporation
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:03:00.0 to 64
iwl4965: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN
iwl4965: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 19 802.11a channels
phy1: Selected rate control algorithm 'iwl-4965-rs'
input: 4965AGN as /class/input/input13
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:03:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
firmware: requesting iwlwifi-4965-1.ucode
iwl4965: Wait for START_ALIVE timeout after 2000ms.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6-amd64 depends on:
ii  linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64    2.6.26-12  Linux 2.6.26 image on AMD64

linux-image-2.6-amd64 recommends no packages.

linux-image-2.6-amd64 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.6.32-1

On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 09:25:04PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 2010-02-21 23:21:47 (+0100), Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 09:13:07PM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> > > Version: 2.6.26+17
> > > Severity: normal
> > > 
> > > Doing 'ifconfig wlan0 up', where wlan0 is an iwl4965 interface
> > > sometimes causes an allocation failure. 
> > > 
> > > I don't see a clear pattern in the occurences. Once the problem has
> > > occured the interface is unusable, even if the module is
> > > unloaded/reloaded.
> > > 
> > > The system is a Thinkpad T61 (Intel Core 2 Duo).
> > 
> > Hi,
> > The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based
> > on 2.6.32. Please test the current 2.6.32 from unstable/testing and tell
> > us whether the problem persists. If so, we should report it upstream
> > to the kernel.org developers.
> > 
> > The 2.6.32 kernel is available from packages.debian.org and can
> > be installed in both Debian stable, testing and unstable
> > installations.
> > 
> 
> I've been unable to reproduce the problem on 2.6.32.

Thanks for the feedback, closing.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: