Bug#606440: marked as done (linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64: Modules build with this headers could not be loaded on kernel (version 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1))
Your message dated Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:18:16 +0100
with message-id <20101209091816.GA26715@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#606440: linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64: Modules build with this headers could not be loaded on kernel (version 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1)
has caused the Debian Bug report #606440,
regarding linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64: Modules build with this headers could not be loaded on kernel (version 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
606440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1
Severity: normal
Hi,
i tryed to build and load a module running the kernel in version:
linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1
trying to load the module i get the following messages:
# modprobe drbd
FATAL: Error inserting drbd (/lib/modules/2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64/kernel/extra/drbd.ko): Invalid module format
# dmesg
[ 1480.020410] drbd: disagrees about version of symbol module_layout
The module is a drbd-Module made with a modified drbd8-source Pakage (using divert). Loading it with kernelverison > 2.6.32-26~bpo50+1 works fine.
Seems there were changes between 2.6.32-23 and 2.6.32-26 which should lead to a higher abi-version number (or i misunderstood http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-packaging.html#s-arch-dep) ?
Can anybody confirm this on squeeze too?
Thx for your help!
Regards,
Ulrich Goettlich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.7
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/ui-bash
Versions of packages linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 depends on:
ii gcc-4.3 4.3.2-1.1 The GNU C compiler
ii linux-headers-2.6.32-b 2.6.32-28~bpo50+1 Common header files for Linux 2.6.
ii linux-kbuild-2.6.32 2.6.32-1~bpo50+1 Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.
linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 recommends no packages.
linux-headers-2.6.32-bpo.5-openvz-amd64 suggests no packages.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:03:10AM +0100, Ulrich Goettlich wrote:
> The module is a drbd-Module made with a modified drbd8-source Pakage (using divert). Loading it with kernelverison > 2.6.32-26~bpo50+1 works fine.
The kernel already includes a working drbd.
> Seems there were changes between 2.6.32-23 and 2.6.32-26 which should lead to a higher abi-version number (or i misunderstood http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-packaging.html#s-arch-dep) ?
No. The ABI of special images like openvz is not always kept stable.
Bastian
--
Each kiss is as the first.
-- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, "The Paradise Syndrome",
stardate 4842.6
--- End Message ---
Reply to: