[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#599616: linux-tools-2.6.36: ..dependency logic bug, should depend on either 1 of sid or experimental binutils, not on both 2.



On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:39:40 +0100, Ben wrote in message 
<1286645980.2955.158.camel@localhost>:

> On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 18:42 +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > Package: linux-tools-2.6.36
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > 
> > ...dependency logic bug; experimental package
> > linux-tools-$(experimental-kernel-version) should depend on either
> > 1 of sid binutils, or on experimental binutils, not on both 2.
> 
> I don't understand.  The dependency is satisfied by sid's binutils:

.._required_, yes, and this required dependency in your experimental
linux-tools-2.6.36 breaks my satisfaction when we wanna experiment 
with experimental binutils, compilers etc on experimental kernel etc
builds to help find real bugs. ;o)

..my suggestion is satisfy the dependency with "one of Sid's or
Experimental's" binutils, or even "one or 2 or 3 or more", and 
not the current "Sid Only Basta!!!".

.."if" my smoke tests crashes, I still get to keep the bits, 
so I can go "Oh Horror!!! Downgrade to Sid!!!". ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



Reply to: