[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#597209: base: keyboard doesn't work properly

reassign 597209 linux-2.6

On Freitag, 17. September 2010, rush wrote:
> Package: base
> Severity: normal
> Hello,
> I've an error in dmesg:
>  $ dmesg | grep -i keyboard
> [    0.430054] atkbd.c: Failed to enable keyboard on isa0060/serio0
> [    0.430174] input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as
> /devices/platform/i8042/serio0/input/input1
> I think it is a reason, that LED indicators don't work at all:
> i can press caps lock or num lock, but it doesn't affect at LED at all, it
> affects only on keyboard behaviour. and this LED is my layout indicator.
> it's too hard to work without it :(
> By the way keyboard if Genius GK-04008/C and it worked perfect with old
> computer (there was debian since debian etch). This bug is only with new
> hardware. I tried to use this keyboard with old one and all is fine. New
> hardware is: AMD Athlon II X2 215 with Gigabyte M52L-S3P. Old one was AMD
> Athlon Dual Core 4050 with EliteGroup GeForce6100PMM2 SocketAM2.
> Also setleds from VT shows nothing about caps lock. it's always off. Others
> (num and scroll) it shows correct, but leds are always turned on.
> By the way, my keyboard configuration:
>  $ grep -vE "^#|^$" /etc/default/keyboard
> XKBMODEL="pc105"
> XKBLAYOUT="us,ru"
> XKBOPTIONS="grp:caps_toggle,grp_led:scroll"
> I tried to change keyboard with dpkg-reconfigure keyboard-configuration,
> but it didn't help me.
> The last one, if it's matter anything my wm is awesome and i haven't any DE
> (like gnome/kde/etc).
> Thank you for your time and help.
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: