* Stephen Powell <zlinuxman@wowway.com> [Tue Aug 24, 2010 at 11:29:47AM -0400]: > On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:08:47 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Report a bug on lilo; I suppose it should warn but still 'succeed' if > > /etc/lilo.conf is missing. elilo should do the same. This is my bug > > and I can fix it. :-) No idea about zipl but I doubt you care about > > s390 live media. > The last time I checked, the official version of lilo in both squeeze > and sid still did not include any hook scripts. Joachim Wiedorn's > latest upstream version, 23.0, does include hook scripts; but Joachim > is not the Debian package maintainer for lilo, William Pitcock still is. > And William's official version does not include the hook scripts. > Therefore, opening a Debian bug report against Joachim's unofficial > Debian package is not appropriate. I do hope that the Technical > Committee eventually gives control of the package to Joachim, but > as far as I know, no decision has yet been made. (See bug number 587886.) ,---- [ aptitude changelog lilo/unstable | head ] | Get: Changelog of lilo | lilo (1:22.8-8.2) unstable; urgency=high | | * Non-maintainer upload. | * Add kernel and initramfs hook scripts to ensure lilo is reinstalled | whenever the kernel or initramfs is updated. (Closes: #590022) | | -- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:25:24 +0100 | | lilo (1:22.8-8.1) unstable; urgency=low `---- regards, -mika-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature