[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Processed: [bts-link] source package linux-2.6



Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package linux-2.6
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg00001.html
> #
> user bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstream@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org).
> # remote status report for #575727 (http://bugs.debian.org/575727)
> #  * https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7407
> #  * remote status changed: ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 575727 + fixed-upstream
Bug #575727 [linux-2.6] [linux-2.6] kernel bug after unmounting a cifs share
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 575727 - status-ASSIGNED
Bug#575727: [linux-2.6] kernel bug after unmounting a cifs share
Usertags were: status-ASSIGNED.
Usertags are now: .
> usertags 575727 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#575727: [linux-2.6] kernel bug after unmounting a cifs share
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> # remote status report for #589690 (http://bugs.debian.org/589690)
> #  * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29153
> #  * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
> #  * remote resolution changed: (?) -> FIXED
> #  * closed upstream
> tags 589690 + fixed-upstream
Bug #589690 [linux-2.6] [drm/i915] oops in i915_irq_emit on 965GM with UMS
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> usertags 589690 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#589690: [drm/i915] oops in i915_irq_emit on 965GM with UMS
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
589690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589690
575727: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575727
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems


Reply to: