On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 15:16:50 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:12:42PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 09:27 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > > [...] > > > Why does linux-tools-2.6 require a specific version of binutils? > > It uses libbfd. > > Okay, so linux-2.6 is now part of a much larger bunch of tightly coupled > packages. perf in "bundling userspace utilities in the kernel source tree is a bad idea" shocker. Would it be possible to link it against libbfd.a instead? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature