Bug#551804: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686: Booting with PAT enabled crashes kernel in OpenGL apps
Hi there,
Sorry for the late reply. I tested with kernel package
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686, version 2.6.32-15, and I can't get the
kernel to crash anymore, nor can I get Processing -- the app I was
using to test OpenGL -- to exhibit any strange behavior, so I suppose
this bug may be closed.
Cheers,
Bram
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> tags 551804 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:48:17PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Bram Senders wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Okay, this problem seems way more involved dan I thought it was... I
>> > don't know whether it is related to OpenGL or Java (which Processing,
>> > the app/framework I am using to test this stuff, is written in), but it
>> > seems unrelated to enabling PAT or not. I kept a little log of the
>> > kernels I tried, with and without PAT, the apps I tried (Processing and
>> > Armagetronad, the first other OpenGL app I could think of) in that
>> > session, and the result. See here:
>> >
>> > 1. 2.6.30, PAT on (tried this a couple of times)
>> > Processing: kernel crash
>> > 2. 2.6.30, PAT off
>> > Processing: works fine (tried for an hour or so)
>> > 3. 2.6.31, PAT on
>> > Processing: apps don't run, I get strange Java tracebacks
>> > about "Target VM failed to initialize"
>> > Armagetronad: works fine (tried for five minutes)
>> > 4. 2.6.30, PAT off
>> > Processing: kernel crash
>> > 5. 2.6.31, PAT on
>> > Processing: kernel crash
>> > 6. 2.6.26, no PAT support
>> > Armagetronad: works fine (played whole match)
>> > Processing: works fine (tried for an hour or so)
>> > 7. 2.6.31, PAT off
>> > Processing: kernel crash
>> > 8. 2.6.26, no PAT support
>> > Processing: got the following error while running an app:
>>
>> sorry for the late followup how does latest 2.6.32-8 behave for your
>> tests?
>
> Bram,
> did you test a current 2.6.32 kernel?
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
>
Reply to: