[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#575924: linux-image-2.6.32-4-amd64: fuse module oops on boot



On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 09:44 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le lundi 12 avril 2010 à 01:18 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 18:23 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > > forwarded 575924 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14347
> > > thanks
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:05:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 23:05 -0400, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:28:24 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > > > The more serious error messages suggest memory  corruption.  Have
> > > > > > you tested the RAM with memtest86+ yet?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, I've just run a pretty long test with memtest86+ and there was
> > > > > no error reported.
> > > > 
> > > > OK, so we can be fairly sure this is a kernel bug.  Please report this
> > > > at <https://bugzilla.kernel.org>.  It is hard to know where the bug
> > > > may be, but try submitting it under product 'Memory Management',
> > > > component 'Slab Allocator'.  Let us know the bug number so we can
> > > > track it.
> > > 
> > > The above bug report looks similar, so I just added comments and dmesgs
> > > there.
> > > Maybe the bug should be retitled ?
> > 
> > I'm not convinced that these are the same bug.  Let's see what the
> > response is.
> 
> There was no response so far and, since boot failures still happen from
> time to time (once a week or so), I may open a new bug upstream...

Please do.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: