On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:02 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote: > > All those patches (except register-glamo.patch) comes from OpenMoko (OM) > > kernel.git, slightly modified to apply to the Debian kernel without > > needing all the changes made by OM. Each patch should refer to the > > correspondign commit(s) from OM git repository. > > Do I miss the fact that OpenMoko is listed as maintainer for this part > of the tree? [...] In other words: we want to see patches that have already been accepted upstream, or backported versions with references to the upstream commit. If OpenMoko was accepted as the maintainer for this platform, then anything they have applied would count as 'upstream', but it isn't. You should be talking to the maintainer for Samsung ARM platforms, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>. Also subscribe to and cc the list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part