On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 01:01 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 16:10 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > > Hi Ben. > > > > On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 14:34 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Version: 2.6.32-11 > > > > > > This was fixed in the above version. > > Should this already work with the linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 kernel? > > > > If so, we'll have to reopen the bug, as it does not longer work, when I > > disable the blacklisting of the eee module. > > I'm sorry, I was confused. Only the 1005HA, 1201N and 1005PE models > were fixed in 2.6.32-11. I never got confirmation from the eeepc-laptop > maintainer that the same change should be applied to the 900A. I have > reopened this bug. I've found the change that Corentin Chary said should cover the 900A. This will be included in 2.6.32-16. Please let us know if this doesn't fix the problem for you. Again, sorry for wrongly claiming it was fixed already. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part