Bug#584891: marked as done (naming and versioning of linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 and linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 confusing)
Your message dated Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:35:16 +0200
with message-id <20100607173516.GA22654@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: naming and versioning of linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 and linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 confusing
has caused the Debian Bug report #584891,
regarding naming and versioning of linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 and linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 confusing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
584891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-image-2.6
Severity: normal
due to some issues i checked today the installed kernel and was rather confused.
beside others i have installed
1) linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
2) linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
dpkg says the versions are respectively
1) 2.6.32-5
2) 2.6.32-15
why does -trunk- have the version 2.6.32-5 while -2.6.32-5- has the version 2.6.32-15?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 02:26:19PM +0200, arne wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6
> Severity: normal
>
> due to some issues i checked today the installed kernel and was rather confused.
> beside others i have installed
> 1) linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686
> 2) linux-image-2.6.32-5-686
>
> dpkg says the versions are respectively
> 1) 2.6.32-5
> 2) 2.6.32-15
>
> why does -trunk- have the version 2.6.32-5 while -2.6.32-5- has the version 2.6.32-15?
The version with "trunk" in the version was accidentally uploaded some time
ago. You should use linux-image-2.6.32-5-686.
Cheers,
Moritz
--- End Message ---
Reply to: