[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#583523: marked as done (clarify which Pentiums are meant in Description)

Your message dated Fri, 28 May 2010 14:09:53 +0100
with message-id <1275052193.26865.2.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#583523: clarify which Pentiums are meant in Description
has caused the Debian Bug report #583523,
regarding clarify which Pentiums are meant in Description
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
583523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-2.6-486
Severity: wishlist

Please clarify "Pentium" in

Description: Linux 2.6 for old PCs (meta-package)
 This package depends on the latest Linux kernel 2.6 and modules for use on
 PCs with a 486, Pentium or compatible processor.

it sound like all Pentiums are meant!

Please clarify if that includes "Intel Pentium Pro/II/III/4/4M/D/M" etc.
or not, or if there is a better package (-686) for them of course.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 11:57 +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-486
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Please clarify "Pentium" in
> 
> Description: Linux 2.6 for old PCs (meta-package)
>  This package depends on the latest Linux kernel 2.6 and modules for use on
>  PCs with a 486, Pentium or compatible processor.
> 
> it sound like all Pentiums are meant!

This should run on any Pentium processor (it is used during
installation).

> Please clarify if that includes "Intel Pentium Pro/II/III/4/4M/D/M" etc.
> or not, or if there is a better package (-686) for them of course.

The short description says 'old PCs' so I think it's clear that this is
not the best package for anything modern.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: