Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2010 22:14:02 +0200 with message-id <[🔎] 7ieih5qagl.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#582107: NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically has caused the Debian Bug report #582107, regarding NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 582107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=582107 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically
- From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:23:05 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87sk5pbdqu.fsf@pirx.pps.jussieu.fr>
Package: nfs-common Version: 1:1.2.2-1 Recent versions of mount.nfs default to NFS version 4. The result is that mounting ordinary version 3 filesystems fails with EPERM. The bug is not the new default, which is open to debate; the bug is that Sun RPC is supposed to allow negotiation of the protocol version, and that mount appears unable to fall back to version 3 if version 4 is not supported by the server. A workaround is to add "vers=3" to the options column in /etc/fstab. --jchAttachment: pgpnOpQ6t8Iki.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Cc: 582107@bugs.debian.org, 582107-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#582107: NFS mounts default to version 4, don't fall back automatically
- From: Juliusz Chroboczek <Juliusz.Chroboczek@pps.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 22:14:02 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 7ieih5qagl.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1274237925.2763.11.camel@localhost> (Ben Hutchings's message of "Wed, 19 May 2010 03:58:45 +0100")
- References: <[🔎] 87sk5pbdqu.fsf@pirx.pps.jussieu.fr> <[🔎] 1274237925.2763.11.camel@localhost>
>> The result is that mounting ordinary version 3 filesystems fails with EPERM. > > I can't reproduce this. Neither can I -- it now appears to work without the vers=3. Sorry for the noise. Juliusz
--- End Message ---