[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#582002: Modules not loading in the proper order (initramfs-tools: s390 architecture)



severity 582002 important
stop

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:39:29AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> 
> I run Debian testing (Squeeze) on the s390 architecture.  I just performed
> an "aptitude update" and "aptitude full-upgrade" sequence, and among the
> updates was a new version of initramfs-tools: 0.94.4.  (I noticed that
> Debian bug report 576603 was opened with a severity of "serious" with the
> apparent goal of keeping the package from migrating from Sid to Squeeze,
> and the bug has not been marked as resolved, nevertheless the package
> did migrate to Squeeze within the past few days.)
> 
> The new package completely broke my system's ability to boot.  Allow me
> to explain the boot mechanism that the old version successfully accomplished,
> and then explain how the new version fails.  I have four different disks,
> one partition each, that are mounted on four different mount points,
> as follows:
> 
>    Device   Mount Point
>    0200     /
>    0201     /boot
>    0202     /home
>    0203     swap
> 
> I have a file called /etc/modprobe.d/dasd which contains the following
> statement:
> 
>    options dasd_mod dasd=0.0.0200(diag),0.0.0201,0.0.0202-0.0.0203(diag)

you need give it a .conf ending then it ends up in initramfs.
soon modprobe will not even look at your file without that ending.
this special needs to be reverted due to stable -> testing upgrade,
but will reappear soon.
 
> This accomplishes two things: (1) it guarantees the correspondence of
> Linux devices names to s390 device numbers as follows:
> 
>    Device
> 
>    0200   /dev/dasda
>    0201   /dev/dasdb
>    0202   /dev/dasdc
>    0203   /dev/dasdd
> 
> and (2) it specifies the device driver used for each disk as follows:

iam not familiar where this files comes from,
so please feel free to reassign to whomever who created it.
and/or maybe to release notes.

thanks

ps thanks for reminding me of 576603, will nuke that and get soonest
   latest git out.



Reply to: