On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 04/06/10 21:30, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > which version of mdadm are you running please post, output of > > dpkg -l mdadm > > > > It is mdadm 3.1.1-1 can't be the code of mdadm 3.1.1-1 can not produce such an error, but the experimental version 3.1.1-1+incremental+4 is faulty. -- maks