[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#561092: marked as done (Linux-image-2.6.30+ post-install)



Your message dated Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:48:43 +0100
with message-id <20100321054843.GS4424@stro.at>
and subject line Re: Linux-image-2.6.30+ post-install
has caused the Debian Bug report #561092,
regarding Linux-image-2.6.30+ post-install
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
561092: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561092
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: Linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
Version: 2.6.30-8squeeze1

In the post-install, the menu.lst file is rewriten and it includes
lines like these:

title        Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.30-2-686
root        (hd0,0)
kernel        /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30-2-686 root=/dev/hda1 ro quiet
initrd        /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30-2-686

title        Debian GNU/Linux, kernel 2.6.30-2-686 (single-user mode)
root        (hd0,0)
kernel        /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30-2-686 root=/dev/hda1 ro single
initrd        /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30-2-686

--------------
I think:

* in menu.lst: /dev/hda1 must be changed to /dev/sda1
* fstab must also be modified. At least for the first time upgrading
from stable to testing/unstable

This is also the case for Linux-image-2.6.31 and Linux-image-2.6.32
and other platforms.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.32-10

the libata switch entered in unstable,
you welcome to test the unstable linux images
and report errors against that.

anyway that bug is closed, due to that.
thanks for the report

-- 
maks


--- End Message ---

Reply to: