Bug#525073: marked as done (network-manager: umts dialin: Total system crash)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:36:43 +0100
with message-id <20100223103643.GC15228@baikonur.stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#525073: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#525073: network-manager: umts dialin: Total system crash
has caused the Debian Bug report #525073,
regarding network-manager: umts dialin: Total system crash
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
525073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=525073
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: network-manager: umts dialin: Total system crash
- From: Thomas Renard <cybaer42@web.de>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:02:52 +0200
- Message-id: <20090421220252.4778.27795.reportbug@bigend.anarcho.loc>
Package: network-manager
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: normal
When trying to connect to my umts/3g provider via a Huawei 160G (Fonic) with
network-manager/network-manager-gnome the whole system crashes. Once I had
a kernel-crash-notify on the desktop then the total crash. No
logging/dmesg/other stuff possible because of the crash :-(
worked with former 0.7.0.100 but I am not shure if the former test was with
kernel 2.6.26-1-686...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages network-manager depends on:
ii adduser 3.110 add and remove users and groups
ii dbus 1.2.12-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii dhcp3-client 3.1.1-6 DHCP client
ii hal 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer
ii ifupdown 0.6.8+nmu1 high level tools to configure netw
ii libc6 2.9-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libdbus-1-3 1.2.12-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libdbus-glib 0.80-3 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libgcrypt11 1.4.4-2 LGPL Crypto library - runtime libr
ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.1-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnutls26 2.6.4-2 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr
ii libgpg-error 1.6-1 library for common error values an
ii libhal1 0.5.12~git20090406.46dc48-2 Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii libnl1 1.1-5 library for dealing with netlink s
ii libnm-glib0 0.7.1-1 network management framework (GLib
ii libnm-util1 0.7.1-1 network management framework (shar
ii libpolkit-db 0.9-3 library for accessing PolicyKit vi
ii libpolkit2 0.9-3 library for accessing PolicyKit
ii libtasn1-3 1.8-1 Manage ASN.1 structures (runtime)
ii libuuid1 1.41.3-1 universally unique id library
ii lsb-base 3.2-22 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip
ii wpasupplican 0.6.9-1 client support for WPA and WPA2 (I
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-13 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages network-manager recommends:
ii dnsmasq-base 2.47-3 A small caching DNS proxy and DHCP
ii iptables 1.4.3.2-1 administration tools for packet fi
ii network-manager-gnome 0.7.1-1 network management framework (GNOM
ii policykit 0.9-3 framework for managing administrat
ii ppp 2.4.4rel-10.1 Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) - da
Versions of packages network-manager suggests:
ii avahi-autoipd 0.6.24-3 Avahi IPv4LL network address confi
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.32-5
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:56:17AM +0100, Thomas Renard wrote:
>
> With 2.6.32-trunk-i686, network-manager 0.7.999-3, and modemmanager
> 0.3-1 everything works fine (sorry for not responding)
>
> Thomas
closing thanks.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: