Bug#516376: Upstream fix available

[Tomas Pospisek <tpo_deb@sourcepole.ch>]

Moritz,

I am not affected by the bug and thus am not in a position to test the 
fix. (I was just doing casual bug triaging and saw and merged all the 
identical nfsd problems and while doing it googled whether there wasn't 
allready a fix for them).

One of the bug reporters could try the sqeeze kernel.

Thanks,
*t

On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 02:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:36:40PM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > > > The fix to the problem seems to be available upstream:
> > > >
> > > >  http://linux-nfs.org/pipermail/nfsv4/2009-March/010018.html
> > > >
> > > > > From Debian changelogs as of 2.6.26-21lenny3 it seems that this particular
> > > > fix hasn't been included yet?
> > >
> > > could be was too lazy to check first but got
> > > 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> > > net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c.rej
> > >
> > > yes so it is in
> > > debian/patches/bugfix/all/sunrpc-add-sv_maxconn-field-to-svc_serv.patch
> > >
> > > in 2.6.26-14
> >
> > In which case that patch doesn't fix the problem (or a similar
> > problem), since several of the reporters have kernels > 2.6.26-14.
> >
> > * 2.6.26-17:       http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516376#19
> > * 2.6.26-17lenny1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=516376#24
> > * 2.6.26-17:       http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=538000
> > * 2.6.26-15lenny3: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532561#5
>
> Hi,
> The next release of Debian (6.0, code name Squeeze) will be based
> on 2.6.32. Please test the current 2.6.32 from unstable/testing and tell
> us whether the problem persists. If so, we should report it upstream
> to the kernel.org developers.
>
> The 2.6.32 kernel is available from packages.debian.org and can
> be installed in both Debian stable, testing and unstable
> installations.
>
> Thanks,
>        Moritz