Bug#534430: Info received (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)

To: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>
Cc: 534430@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#534430: Info received (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:09:14 +0100
Message-id: <20100220090914.GA5085@galadriel.inutil.org>
Reply-to: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>, 534430@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1264941877.3753.1.camel@tranquility.sigsegv.cx>
References: <1264589360.29501.2.camel@tranquility.sigsegv.cx> <handler.534430.B534430.126459148420925.ackinfo@bugs.debian.org> <1264592287.29501.20.camel@tranquility.sigsegv.cx> <20100131121252.GA5939@galadriel.inutil.org> <1264941877.3753.1.camel@tranquility.sigsegv.cx>

Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:12 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:38:07AM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > > Sorry, ignore my previous email. 
> > > 
> > > I think I got to it, for whatever reason it is not getting set in
> > > cbq_set_lss(), just can't figure out what is wrong.
> > 
> > Anton, 
> > as per your posting on linux-netdev I understand this bug can be closed?
> 
> Yes. 
> 
> It is "bad english" in the output of tc combined with "bad timing" since
> kernel has gone to high perf timers. 2.6.9 and even 2.6.18 delivered
> considerably better traffic shaping performance.

Can #534444 also be closed?

Cheers,
        Moritz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#534430: Info received (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)
  - From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#523828: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-486: fails to find modules.pcimap)
Next by Date: Bug#516376: Upstream fix available
Previous by thread: Bug#523828: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-2-486: fails to find modules.pcimap)
Next by thread: Bug#534430: Info received (linux-image-2.6.26: CBQ broken)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread