[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#505579: marked as done (kernel's loading taking 2 or 3 minutes)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010 19:11:48 +0100
with message-id <20100217181148.GA2616@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#505579: kernel's loading taking 2 or 3 minutes
has caused the Debian Bug report #505579,
regarding kernel's loading taking 2 or 3 minutes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
505579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=505579
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-9
Severity: normal

I've had problems booting with Lilo: kernel's loading take 2 or 3 minutes (may 
be even more).

The whole system is on LVM, using Debian Sid.. 
It's a brand new install on a Dell Latitude 131L laptop, using a new hard 
drive (after a crash of the previous HD). This new hard drive is of the same 
model as the previous one, except the size which is double. 

Previously the laptop was running (fine) Debian Sid but without LVM. 

I'm not able to give more details because currently the system is unbootable 
after an upgrade to version 2.6.26-10. See bugs not yet reported with 
subjects:
1. "Unbootable after kernel upgrade: Lilo can't load kernel"
2. "Kernel unable to mount file system and to execute init"

regards
-- 
Xavier
xavier@alternatif.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:02:32PM +0100, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 février 2010 18:55:01, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:19:17PM +0100, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> > > Le mardi 16 février 2010 22:39:04, Moritz Muehlenhoff a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 06:06:10PM +0100, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> > > > > Le vendredi 14 novembre 2008 17:05:35, vous avez écrit :
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:17:38PM +0100, Xavier Brochard wrote:
> > > > > > > I've had problems booting with Lilo: kernel's loading take 2 or 3
> > > > > > > minutes (may be even more).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please provide the complete log. Current kernels provides wallclock
> > > > > > information in every log entry.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope dmesg is what you need, but there is not much information.
> > > > > The slowness is before the kernel boot, while Lilo is loading the
> > > > > kernel, before loading initrd and before the kernel boot.
> > > >
> > > > This is likely rather a lilo than a kernel bug. Is there a specific
> > > > reason you're using the deprecated lilo rather than grub or grub2?
> > >
> > > This is an old bug report, I think I've used lilo because the installer
> > > was unable to setup grub. I've installed grub (and then grub2) manually
> > > later.
> > 
> > I.e, it works with grub(2) now?
> 
> oh yes, with both grub and grub2.

Ok, closing. This appears like a lilo bug, but reassigning doesn't make much
sense if you've migrated in the mean time.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: