[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: cloning 568317, reassign -1 to kernel-package



On Mon, Feb 15 2010, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 20:13 -0800, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>>         This is a duplicate of Bug#568823, already reported by the OP,
>>  and already tagged pending. Secondly, none of these bugs actually exist
>>  in kernel-package anymore, since it no longer is using the ancient
>>  versions of the scripts that linux-2.6 is apparently using.
>
> We're busy getting rid of them too, thanks.


        That's great news.

>>  Could y'all be a bit less hair trigger about assigning bugs to k-p?
>
> The OP asked us to report the bug, so I assumed he didn't.

        Well, isn't that why we have reportbug?

        In any case, can we agree that the code bases have diverged to
 the extent that a bug in linux-2.6 no longer translates to a similar
 bug in k-p, and  thus no longer needs to be cloned, unless there is
 first hand evidence that the same problem applies?

        I certainly think so, and thus no longer follow the
 debian-kernel mailing list with any modicum of attention.

        manoj
-- 
Everyone was born right-handed.  Only the greatest overcome it.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>  
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20  05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C


Reply to: