Bug#549606: [linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64] VIA-Rhine II network interface lost connectivity
El Lunes 15 Febrero 2010, Moritz Muehlenhoff escribió:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:10 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > > El Jueves 08 Octubre 2009, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> > > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:03 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > Googling around I found this bug is quite old:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0302.1/0966.html
> > > > >
> > > > > And this:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://fixunix.com/suse/125711-problem-via-rhine-ii-eth0.html
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems the fix is not the same for everyone.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think those are the same bug as this.
> > > >
> > > > > Supposing the only fix by now is a kernel option, should I close
> > > > > this bug?
> > > >
> > > > No, it should stay open until there is a proper fix.
> > > >
> > > > Ben.
> > >
> > > It seems the network is behaving quite well with noapic (and no
> > > irqfixup/irqpoll) :-).
> > >
> > > So I shall keep this open until news are available.
> >
> > Please can you report this bug at <http://bugzilla.kernel.org>,
> > including the fact that 'noapic' works around it. The product should be
> > 'Platform Specific/Hardware' and the component 'i386'. Let us know the
> > bug number so we can keep track of it.
>
> Antonio, did you report this upstream?
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
>
I'm very sorry, I completely forgot this bug tracking. I shall try kernel
2.6.32 in order to see if this bug persists, and if so I will report upstream.
I'll keep you posted.
Regards,
Antonio
Reply to: