[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#551733: linux-image-2.6.26-2-686: Cannot boot kernel 2.6.26-2-686





maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Bruce Ward wrote:

Greetings.

More data. I have managed to get an initramfs debug out of the
system and have also provided a debug from a 2.6.26-1-686 kernel
which boots OK. I'm damned if I can see any reason from the debug
for the recent kernel (2.6.26-2-686) to fail to boot!

Interesting (but possibly not relevant) observations from my playing
around (exploration). Remember there are only a few modules (thermal
ones) loaded when the system drops out.

1. Load USB drivers - they find the pendrive, but no entry created in /dev.
2. Use mknod to create /dev/sda3 for the ext3 partition on pendrive.
sda3 is the only SCSI entry in /dev.
3. Load ext3 module, and mount the sda3 partition and, behold, there
are entries in /dev/ for sda, sda1, and sda2, as well as sda3.
4. Load the SATA drivers and suddenly there are sdb entries in /dev
for all partitions on the drive I have failed to boot from.

that points a bit to udev is it running  at this stage?

Yes, udev is running. Attached is a ps capture as soon as I had the pendrive mounted.

When the boot stopped, the listing of processes stopped at PID 732. udev is there before running the rescue shell.

Bruce

===============================
Bruce Ward, Nelson, New Zealand
PID   USER     COMMAND
    1 0        /bin/sh /init 
    2 0        [kthreadd]
    3 0        [migration/0]
    4 0        [ksoftirqd/0]
    5 0        [watchdog/0]
    6 0        [events/0]
    7 0        [khelper]
   39 0        [kblockd/0]
   41 0        [kacpid]
   42 0        [kacpi_notify]
  149 0        [kseriod]
  186 0        [pdflush]
  187 0        [pdflush]
  188 0        [kswapd0]
  189 0        [aio/0]
  396 0        udevd --daemon 
  732 0        /bin/sh -i 
  736 0        [ksuspend_usbd]
  739 0        [khubd]
  788 0        [scsi_eh_0]
  789 0        [usb-storage]
  842 0        [kjournald]
  843 0        ps 

Reply to: