Re: [Debian] openvz kernel for debian squeeze
Hi Kir
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:33:05PM +0300, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> Hi Ola, guys,
>
> Thanks for the info. We have discussed this at length and
> the resolution is we are all for it. This means we will try
> hard to do a rebase as soon as possible, and I hope we
> will succeed.
Sounds great.
> If (or whenever you will) know the exact deadline date
> (or any close approximation), please let us know, this is
> important.
I will let you know when I know. So far I do not know better
than the below.
> Also, can you please point us to the location of the git
> repository of what will become the linux kernel for the
> next debian release? I checked git.debian.org but
> where there are too many kernels to look at.
> If it is not in git then when it is?
You have the kernel team page at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel
As you can see subversion is used for all kernel packaging
handling.
Information about the source is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernelSource
Please tell me if you do not find what you are looking for
there.
I'll dig into the kernel archive now to see information about
which kernel that will be used for next stable release.
Best regards,
// Ola
> Regards,
> Kir.
>
> On 02/09/2010 10:31 AM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>> Hi Kir and other Openvz people
>>
>> We are closing in to the freeze period. This means that we have about
>> a month to include openvz enabled kernels in Debian.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> // Ola
>>
>> ----- Forwarded message from Marc Brockschmidt<he@debian.org> -----
>>
>> Envelope-to: ola@inguza.com
>> Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:51:21 +0100
>> Old-Return-Path:<marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on liszt.debian.org
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,LDO_WHITELIST,
>> PGPSIGNATURE autolearn=failed version=3.2.5
>> X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank moderated
>> X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
>> tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5]
>> autolearn=ham
>> X-Greylist: delayed 2161 seconds by postgrey-1.31 at liszt; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:50:05 UTC
>> From: Marc Brockschmidt<he@debian.org>
>> To: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: Bits from the release team: Release schedule; the RT needs YOU
>> X-Debian-Message: Signature check passed for Debian member
>> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>> X-Rc-Spam: 2008-11-04_01
>> Resent-Message-ID:<U_K1m-nG9GG.A.AhF.9rGcLB@liszt>
>> Resent-From: debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org
>> X-Mailing-List:<debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1209
>> List-Id:<debian-devel-announce.lists.debian.org>
>> List-Post:<mailto:debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org>
>> List-Help:<mailto:debian-devel-announce-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe:<mailto:debian-devel-announce-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
>> List-Unsubscribe:<mailto:debian-devel-announce-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> Resent-Sender: debian-devel-announce-request@lists.debian.org
>> Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 19:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
>> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
>> X-Spamcheck-provider: Checked for spam by inguza.net, postmaster@inguza.net
>>
>> Heya,
>>
>> As you may have noticed, updates from the release team have been scarce
>> in the past few months. We are trying to perform better in the future,
>> but would be glad to get help.
>>
>> Release schedule
>> ================
>> We hoped to freeze in March, but the current number of RC bugs makes
>> this highly unlikely. From our experiences with previous release cycles,
>> we wish to freeze only after the number of these bugs has dropped below
>> the mark of 300. As you can see on the usual overview pages [RC-Bugs],
>> we are currently far away from this goal.
>>
>> Work towards fixing these bugs is greatly appreciated. We will use our
>> release superpowers to aggressively remove leaf packages from testing
>> (in fact, another round of removals happened on the weekend). Please
>> check if packages you maintain or use are removal candidates, for
>> example by running ``rc-alert'' (from the devscripts package).
>>
>> There are still some ongoing transitions, but we are confident of finishing
>> them as part of our usual day-to-day business. Some smaller transitions
>> are still in the queue, but should be finished fast as soon as they get
>> the green light.
>>
>> Request for help
>> ================
>> As you may have noticed, the release team has been notably less active in
>> the last six months. If you want to invest more time into making Squeeze
>> the best Debian release ever, feel free to send a mail or contact us in
>> IRC. We need more manpower to coordinate transitions and bug fixes, so
>> please consider lending a helping hand.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Marc
>>
>> Footnotes:
>> [RC-Bugs] http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
>> http://bts.turmzimmer.net/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian mailing list
> Debian@openvz.org
> https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/debian
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| ola@inguza.com 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| http://inguza.com/ +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: