[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#547503: git-core: "git clone" fails on armel



# Sascha Silbe wrote:
# >  Confirmed, it still breaks with the old kernel
# > (2.6.31-rc9-flatty-ocf-1-00293-g53a104c), but works with
# > the current one (2.6.32-rc4-flatty-ocf-1-00488-g4b69b78).
reassign 547503 linux-2.6 2.6.31~rc9
fixed 547503 linux-2.6/2.6.32~rc8-1~experimental.1
thanks

Hi kernel team,

Here's a bug report on armel I forgot to pass on a few months ago:

| $ git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git sugar-jhbuild
| Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/sugar-jhbuild/.git/
| remote: Counting objects: 4772, done.
| remote: Compressing objects: 100% (2079/2079), done.
| error: inflate: data stream error (invalid distance too far back)
| fatal: pack has bad object at offset 616818: inflate returned -3
| fatal: index-pack failed
| $ git clone git://git.gnome.org/jhbuild
| Initialized empty Git repository in /home/sascha.silbe/jhbuild/.git/
| remote: Counting objects: 19804, done.
| remote: Compressing objects: 100% (6374/6374), done.
| fatal: pack has bad object at offset 487227: inflate returned -5
| fatal: index-pack failed
| $

Upgrading the kernel fixed the problem. See
http://bugs.debian.org/547503 for more details.

I wrote:

> The only possibly relevant kernel change I could find was commit
> 5a3a29f (ARM: 5691/1: fix cache aliasing issues between kmap() and
> kmap_atomic() with highmem, commit 7929eb9 upstream) from 2.6.31.1.

and I still stand by that.

The bug is in your hands now. :) If you want to try to reproduce it,
I'd suggest reverting that commit on an armel machine and watching the
fireworks.  If you don't want to reproduce it, I think it should be
pretty safe to close.

Regards,
Jonathan


Reply to: