[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#559444: marked as done (linux-2.6: sv_addr.agh has no source file)

Your message dated Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:02:00 +0000
with message-id <1259935320.4532.10.camel@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#559444: linux-2.6: sv_addr.agh has no source file
has caused the Debian Bug report #559444,
regarding linux-2.6: sv_addr.agh has no source file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
559444: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559444
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-2.6
Version: linux-2.6-2.6.32~rc8
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1


Hi,
./arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/sv_addr.agh appears to be generated from
another file, which is not in the Linux source tree.
Ref: http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00323
Ref: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-dev/2009-08/msg00188.html

Thanks for investigating,
kk


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.7-libre-fshoppe1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 00:00 +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: linux-2.6-2.6.32~rc8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
> 
> 
> Hi,
> ./arch/cris/include/arch-v10/arch/sv_addr.agh appears to be generated from
> another file, which is not in the Linux source tree.
> Ref: http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00323
> Ref: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-dev/2009-08/msg00188.html

This is true, but changing that other file would mean changing the
hardware design, and it is probably a bit late to do that. :-)  So I see
no reason why this file cannot be the preferred form for modification
now.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
                                                         - Carolyn Scheppner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: