Re: linux-image-2.6.31-rc2-686 no media modules - why?
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:44:00AM +0200, Mike and Willi Knuth wrote:
> > Is there any good reason to castrate a kernel this way?
>
> Please fix your attitude. It is unacceptable to incriminate the
> maintainer of a package for unnoticed or unfixed bugs, especially in
> highly expermental software.
funnily upstream gave no default on that Kconfig option,
thus it defaults to no. next rc3 has it set to modular.
anyway next time a polite mail would do a better job.
Reply to: