[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [kernel] r13859 - dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/linux



On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 09:26:00AM +0000, Maximilian Attems wrote:
> Author: maks
> Date: Wed Jul  1 09:25:58 2009
> New Revision: 13859
> 
> Log:
> revert wording of firmware-linux

wow... just reverting w/o discussing w/ the committer? That's a bit
rude.

> packaging details have no place in longdesc,

since when? Long descriptions are full of packaging details. In many
cases long descriptions _are_ packaging details.

> also it should be clear where those firmware come from,
> which the rewording completly lost.

The reason for the original commit was that it isn't clear to users why
some firmware is in this blob and others are split out. I didn't know
either - discussed it on IRC, and found that this is the current
reasoning. I know you disagree with how the firmware is organized, but
that is how it is organized today, and it seemed like users deserved
the clarification.

> also NACK on s/firmware/drivers/

"NACK" - nice

> 
> Modified:
>    dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/linux/defines
> 
> Modified: dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/linux/defines
> ==============================================================================
> --- dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/linux/defines	Wed Jul  1 09:20:17 2009	(r13858)
> +++ dists/trunk/firmware-nonfree/linux/defines	Wed Jul  1 09:25:58 2009	(r13859)
> @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
>  [base]
> -desc: various drivers in the Linux kernel
> +desc: various firmware for the Linux kernel
>  longdesc:
> - various drivers in the Linux kernel. This is a collection of firmware blobs
> - which are not individually large enough to warrant a standalone package
> + all firmware which was formerly shipped in the Linux image.
>  files:
>   3com/typhoon.bin
>   dabusb/bitstream.bin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel-svn-changes mailing list
> Kernel-svn-changes@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-svn-changes
> 

-- 
dann frazier


Reply to: