[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#531328: marked as done (firmware-linux: Description should state that it's just related to Debian's kernel images)

Your message dated Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:16:16 +0200
with message-id <20090701091616.GA28673@stro.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#531328: firmware-linux: Description should state that it's just related to Debian's kernel images
has caused the Debian Bug report #531328,
regarding firmware-linux: Description should state that it's just related to Debian's kernel images
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
531328: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531328
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: firmware-linux
Version: 0.16
Severity: minor

Hi!

While tracking down a suspend/resume issue, I came across firmware-linux 
and wondered if it's needed for vanilla kernels (self compiled).

I guess this package is only necessary for the kernels shipped with 
Debian, so making it clear that it's not required for kernel.org's 
kernel sources would reduce some (at least my) confusion.

Cheerio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.28.7
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 31 May 2009, Adrian Knoth wrote:

> 
> While tracking down a suspend/resume issue, I came across firmware-linux 
> and wondered if it's needed for vanilla kernels (self compiled).
> 
> I guess this package is only necessary for the kernels shipped with 
> Debian, so making it clear that it's not required for kernel.org's 
> kernel sources would reduce some (at least my) confusion.
> 

closing as reporter hasn't come forward with a usefull suggestion.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: