On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:45 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 10:35 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : > > Unfortunately no-one involved in g-p-m ever specified exactly what the > > kernel bug is or was that they believed was responsible. I am as much > > in the dark as you are. > > So am I. HAL frontends such as g-p-m are entirely dependent on what the > kernel exposes for all their functionality, and to us maintainers it is > just a black box. Then how do you know it was even at fault in this case? Upstream was very quick to point the finger at the kernel, apparently having identified this as a specific bug. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part