Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts

To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts
From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 16:18:04 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090401141804.GW27571@stro.at>
Mail-followup-to: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20090401115654.GR27571@stro.at>
References: <200903250011.20157.elendil@planet.nl> <200903311954.52199.elendil@planet.nl> <20090331222859.GU3901@baikonur.stro.at> <[🔎] 200904010857.06815.elendil@planet.nl> <[🔎] 20090401115654.GR27571@stro.at>

On Wed, 01 Apr 2009, maximilian attems wrote:

> what be cool would be to have it use debhelper instead of the
> dpkg call.

also a linux header and linux-libc-dev package creation.

-- 
maks

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

References:
- Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts
  - From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts
  - From: maximilian attems <max@stro.at>

Prev by Date: Bug#499745: Experiencing this with KVM, too
Next by Date: Bug#444182: pata disabled in ata_piix
Previous by thread: Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts
Next by thread: Re: Standardizing use of kernel hook scripts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread