Bug#539140: marked as done (debconf: Add explicit (Y/n) question to kernel remove safeguard)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:12:59 +0100
with message-id <20091230011258.GA7074@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: debconf: Add explicit (Y/n) question to kernel remove safeguard
has caused the Debian Bug report #539140,
regarding debconf: Add explicit (Y/n) question to kernel remove safeguard
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
539140: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debconf: Add explicit (Y/n) question to kernel remove safeguard
- From: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto@cante.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:07:22 +0300
- Message-id: <20090729110722.20218.36736.reportbug@jondo.cante.net>
Package: debconf
Version: 1.5.27
Severity: normal
Attempting a kernel remove:
Configuring linux-image-2.6.26-1-686
------------------------------------
You are running a kernel (version 2.6.26-1-686) and attempting to remove the same version.
This can make the system unbootable as it will remove
/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.26-1-686 and all modules under the directory
/lib/modules/2.6.26-1-686. This can only be fixed with a copy of
the kernel image and the corresponding modules.
It is highly recommended to abort the kernel removal unless you
are prepared to fix the system after removal.
Abort kernel removal?
SUGGESTION
Please spell out the last question explicitly:
Abort kernel removal (Y/n)?
Reads:
Y = the default if return pressed.
Accept all key caps for an answer: Y, y
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages debconf depends on:
ii debconf-i18n 1.5.27 full internationalization support
ii perl-base 5.10.0-24 minimal Perl system
Versions of packages debconf recommends:
ii apt-utils 0.7.21 APT utility programs
Versions of packages debconf suggests:
ii debconf-doc 1.5.27 debconf documentation
ii debconf-utils 1.5.27 debconf utilities
ii dialog 1.1-20080819-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii gnome-utils 2.26.0-1 GNOME desktop utilities
ii libgnome2-perl 1.042-2 Perl interface to the GNOME librar
pn libnet-ldap-perl <none> (no description available)
pn libqt-perl <none> (no description available)
ii libterm-readline-gnu-perl 1.19-1 Perl extension for the GNU Readlin
ii perl 5.10.0-24 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii whiptail 0.52.10-4 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
-- debconf information excluded
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 539140-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: debconf: Add explicit (Y/n) question to kernel remove safeguard
- From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:12:59 +0100
- Message-id: <20091230011258.GA7074@galadriel.inutil.org>
- In-reply-to: <20090729110722.20218.36736.reportbug@jondo.cante.net>
- References: <20090729110722.20218.36736.reportbug@jondo.cante.net>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 02:07:22PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Package: debconf
> Version: 1.5.27
> Severity: normal
Closing, this is within the domain of the debconf frontend in use and
already implemented as outlined by Joey.
Cheers,
Moritz
--- End Message ---
Reply to: