[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#504502: marked as done (btrfs-source - BUG during bonnie)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:36:55 +0100
with message-id <20091230003655.GA5099@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#504502: btrfs-source - BUG during bonnie
has caused the Debian Bug report #504502,
regarding btrfs-source - BUG during bonnie
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
504502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: btrfs-source
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: grave

btrfs crashs during the first bonnie run on a -686-bigmem Debian kernel.

| Btrfs v0.16 loaded
| device fsid 5040f1716e8b0b41-88d8a2bd5feac9c devid 1 transid 12 /dev/xvdb
| space info full 1
| space info full 36
| allocation failed flags 36
| ------------[ cut here ]------------
| kernel BUG at [...]/linux-modules-extra-2.6-2.6.26/debian/build/build_i386_none_686-bigmem_btrfs/extent-tree.c:2111!
| invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
| Modules linked in: btrfs libcrc32c ipv6 evdev joydev xen_netfront pcspkr ext3 jbd mbcache xen_blkfront thermal_sys
|   
| Pid: 8704, comm: bonnie Not tainted (2.6.26-1-686-bigmem #1)
| EIP: 0061:[<d08985cd>] EFLAGS: 00010292 CPU: 0
| EIP is at __btrfs_reserve_extent+0x267/0x2ab [btrfs]
| EAX: 0000002d EBX: c98e43e4 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
| ESI: c98e43e4 EDI: 00000024 EBP: 00000000 ESP: ce9a5c14
|  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069
| Process bonnie (pid: 8704, ti=ce9a4000 task=cef51a40 task.ti=ce9a4000)
| Stack: d08ba311 00000024 00000000 ce9d609c c57a7e00 c98e43e4 ce9d6000 c57a7e00
|        c98e43e4 ce9a5cdf c98e43e4 d089865d 00001000 00000000 00001000 00000000
|        00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff ce9a5cdf 00000000
| Call Trace:
|  [<d089865d>] btrfs_alloc_extent+0x4c/0x99 [btrfs]
|  [<d0898702>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x58/0x83 [btrfs]
|  [<d088dada>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x20f/0x570 [btrfs]
|  [<d088df9e>] btrfs_cow_block+0x163/0x16c [btrfs]
|  [<d08912dd>] btrfs_search_slot+0x340/0xfab [btrfs]
|  [<d088fd1c>] btrfs_del_items+0x428/0x432 [btrfs]
|  [<d08a9486>] btrfs_inode_ref_index+0x9b/0xa9 [btrfs]
|  [<d089973d>] btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item+0x4e/0x79 [btrfs]
|  [<d08a2ff4>] btrfs_unlink_trans+0x133/0x204 [btrfs]
|  [<d08a33b1>] btrfs_unlink+0x68/0xa5 [btrfs]
|  [<c0185453>] vfs_unlink+0x8c/0xd7
|  [<c0186b61>] do_unlinkat+0xa2/0x136
|  [<c022d766>] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0xc1/0xf1
|  [<c01088ce>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
|  =======================
| Code: 55 57 ff 74 24 34 ff 74 24 34 8b 44 24 1c e8 1e ca ff ff 83 c4 14 e9 50 fe ff ff 85 c0 74 13 55 57 68 11 a3 8b d0 e8 22 14 89 ef <0f> 0b 83 c4 0c eb fe 8b 74 24 4c 8b 7c 24 04 8b 16 8b 87 e0 00
| EIP: [<d08985cd>] __btrfs_reserve_extent+0x267/0x2ab [btrfs] SS:ESP 0069:ce9a5c14
| ---[ end trace 2d1c7656a4250c53 ]---

Bastian

-- 
Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.6.32-1

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:33:11PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Daniel, did you reproduce this with the mainlined version of btrfs?
> 
> i reproduced it once with the .29 mainline, which is why i've reassigned
> it. no idea about .30, you may want to ask the submitter to follow
> up/reproduce.

I can't reproduce with 2.6.32.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: