[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#561609: linux-latest-2.6 vs. apt-listchanges



Package: linux-image-686
Version: 2.6.32+23
Severity: wishlist
X-debbugs-cc: apt-listchanges@packages.debian.org

I notice apt-listchanges is fooled by the formatting of linux-latest-2.6
into always regurgitating older changes each time somehow.

$ perl -nwle 'next if /^  |^$/;print' mbox|grep -C 8 latest|head -n 20
hal (0.5.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>  Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:19:49 +0100
--- iceweasel 的改變 ---
iceweasel (3.5.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Mike Hommey <glandium@debian.org>  Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:08:01 +0100
--- libtheora 的改變 (libtheora0) ---
libtheora (1.1.1+dfsg.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 -- John Francesco Ferlito <johnf@inodes.org>  Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:33:07 +1100
--- linux-latest-2.6 的改變 (linux-image-2.6-686 linux-image-686) ---
linux-latest-2.6 (23) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>  Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:31:19 +0000
linux-latest-2.6 (22) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>  Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:33:06 +0000
linux-latest-2.6 (21) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>  Sat, 03 Oct 2009 17:43:55 +0100
linux-latest-2.6 (20) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>  Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:13:54 +0200
linux-latest-2.6 (19) unstable; urgency=low
 -- Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>  Sun, 10 May 2009 14:10:07 +0200
linux-latest-2.6 (18) unstable; urgency=low



Reply to: