On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 14:03 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > reopen 550990 > thanks > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > No, IPv6 is not broken. At least, not by the kernel. > > > > This is probably a bug in glibc or openssh. > > Please don't close bugs outright if you believe they're only misfiled. > The bug is there; if you claim that it is not a kernel bug, then that's > fine, but that doesn't mean you should assert it does not exist. Wouter, you're quite capable of investigating bugs and writing a descriptive title. Don't act like a luser. [...] > Now I'm definitely willing to do some more investigation in order to > pinpoint the right package to reassign this bug to, but please don't > just tell me outright that it's not a bug again next time. You said "IPv6 is broken" and I correctly said "IPv6 is not broken". Ben. -- Ben Hutchings The most exhausting thing in life is being insincere. - Anne Morrow Lindberg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part