On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 09:27 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:37:18AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is my suggested change, so far only compile-tested:
> >
> > --- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
> > +++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
> > @@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
> >
> > if (hfsplus_get_last_session(sb, &part_start, &part_size))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > + if (part_start + part_size >= 0x100000000) {
> > + pr_err("hfs: volumes larger than 2TB are not supported yet\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> minor point, but maybe s/hfs/hfsplus/ ?
[...]
This is consistent with other log messages from hfsplus. While I think
the prefix *should* be "hfsplus: ", it seemed to me that it would be
worse to be inconsistent. Also, the original HFS is intrinsically
limited to 2TB so this message is true for both of them.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
To err is human; to really foul things up requires a computer.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part