[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#517449: Found in Debian 5.0.3 - Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-19)



On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 11:12 +0100, Berni Elbourn wrote:
> Sorry but after running for weeks with no problems using this kernel:
> 
> Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-17lenny1) (dannf@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) 
> (Debian 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Sun Jul 26 20:35:48 UTC 2009
> 
> On a Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2372 HE stepping 02
> 
> I safe-upgrade'd on Friday to:
> 
> Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-19) (dannf@debian.org) (gcc version 4.1.3 20080704 (prerelease) (Debian 
> 4.1.2-25)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 22:33:18 UTC 20
> 09
> 
> On Saturday this happened...
> 
> Oct  3 21:37:21 sv28 kernel: [249332.516721] INFO: task postdrop:26510 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Oct  3 21:37:55 sv28 kernel: [249366.876742] INFO: task pickup:26511 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Oct  3 21:39:29 sv28 kernel: [249461.364772] INFO: task postdrop:26510 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Oct  3 21:39:51 sv28 kernel: [249482.840771] INFO: task kvm:4454 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Oct  3 21:40:04 sv28 kernel: [249495.724775] INFO: task pickup:26511 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> Oct  3 21:41:38 sv28 kernel: [249590.216775] INFO: task postdrop:26510 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

Please note that the 'task <name>:<pid> blocked for more than <time>'
messages are *symptoms* and in no way indicate a particular bug.  The
more people add to this bug report, the less meaningful it becomes.

> <snip>
> 
> And by Monday the console was unresponsive,  even to magic - sysrq.  I am pretty sure the machine was not under any 
> stress at 9:30 on Saturday. No users, and backups start after 11pm.
> 
> Is it possible the some fixes have dropped out of current releases?

No.

> I have reverted the kernel back to Linux version 2.6.26-2-amd64 (Debian 2.6.26-17lenny1)
[...]

You are falling for the fallacy:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc>.

Please do not discourage people from installing security updates.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
I say we take off; nuke the site from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: