Your message dated Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:35:05 +0100 with message-id <1254609305.2395.18.camel@localhost> and subject line Re: upgrade dependencies of dummy packages has caused the Debian Bug report #519531, regarding upgrade dependencies of dummy packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 519531: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519531 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: upgrade dependencies of dummy packages
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <christoph.anton.mitterer@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:41:27 +0100
- Message-id: <20090313114127.18764enigp7x8r6s@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Package: linux-image-686 Severity: wishlist Hi.can you please upgrade this and similar packages (e.g. linux-image-2.6-686 or the ones on other architectures) to depend on 2.6.28 images?Thanks, Chris. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 519531-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: upgrade dependencies of dummy packages
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
- Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 23:35:05 +0100
- Message-id: <1254609305.2395.18.camel@localhost>
Version: 2.6.29+18 linux-latest-2.6 was updated to refer to Linux 2.6.29 in the above version. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---