[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#514418: marked as done ([FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Sep 2009 22:47:03 +0100
with message-id <20090901214703.GD30210@decadent.org.uk>
and subject line Re: [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...
has caused the Debian Bug report #514418,
regarding [FIX]: ultra45 boot failing...
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
514418: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=514418
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-13
Severity: grave

I consider this RC. We'll break X.org either for r0 or r1.

debian-sparc: Please provide someone who wants to take over sparc
architecture maintenance of the Linux packages.

On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 10:45:31AM +0000, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:11:44PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > The patch:
> > 
> > 	debian/patches/bugfix/sparc/arch_pci_hostcontroller_workaround.patch
> > 
> > causes ultra45 (and other PCI-Express based workstations) to
> > hard reset when the PCI bus is initially scanned by the kernel.
> > 
> > Please revert this patch from the debian kernel in Lenny and
> > anywhere else it appears.
> > 
> > The code in that patch creating dummy PCI root host controller nodes
> > is wrong and does nothing other than cause trouble.  If it fixes some
> > problem with the X server for PCI devices on sparc64 that problem
> > needs to be fixed some other way.
> > 
> > Thank you.
> 
> I believe that we are just a few days from Lenny release, so uploading 
> a new kernel and rebuilding debian-installer might not be an option 
> at this point, unfortunately. The best we can probably do is include 
> the fixed kernel in the point release, but that's up to kernel team 
> to decide. 

Bastian

-- 
A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her.
		-- McCoy, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.6.26-14

13:52 < bwh> davem: btw, the Debian bug with PCI enumeration by X vs kernel
             is supposed to be fixed, but perhaps you could verify that?
             http://bugs.debian.org/514418
22:38 < davem> bwh: yes that debian bug is fixed

-- 
Ben Hutchings
The program is absolutely right; therefore, the computer must be wrong.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: