Re: Bug#543452: ata-FUJITSU_MHT2040AT_FUJITSU_MHT2040AT
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 28, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> And you don't ever reassign bugs to the kernel if you have not at least
>> collect _any_ information. It only happens with the experimental version
>> of udev.
> Well, I am sorry that the submitter is an idiot who reported false
> information... Indeed this is not dependent from the kernel release.
I cannot understand how such words can be used!
Perhaps the submitter makes a mistake.
Perhaps some other things happens (for example, it could be that the
previous kernel of the submitter does not have its initrd regenerated
so the old version of ata_id was used in the initrd)
Perhaps ...
But none of this allows you to tell on public place that the submitter
is an idiot! And I'm not sure at all that the submitter reported wrong
information (perhaps not complete enough, but then you should have asked).
I'm very disappointed when I see such words used by a DD. It's the best
way to discourage users to report the bugs they see.
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanjean@debian.org
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial pacakges: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo: deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
Reply to: