[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#454777: marked as done (Please continue to provide k7 images)

Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:10:38 +0200
with message-id <20090820171038.GB18469@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#454777: Please continue to provide k7 images
has caused the Debian Bug report #454777,
regarding Please continue to provide k7 images
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
454777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=454777
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.23-1
Priority: wishlist

Hi guys,

I stumbled above the changelog of the new kernel image:

"   * [i386] Drop k7 images."

It would be really great if you would continue to provide k7-images. Would this be possible?


Thanks for all your great work and efforts,
Ralf


--------------------------------------------------------------------
Die Abacho-Surftipps:
- http://www.abacho4you.de - Gestalten Sie Ihre eigene Suchmaschine!
- http://www.My-Hammer.de - Die große Rückwärtsauktion
für Handwerks- und Dienstleistungsaufträge!
--------------------------------------------------------------------

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 09:26:23PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:41:05PM +0100, gandy@abacho.de wrote:
> > I stumbled above the changelog of the new kernel image:
> > 
> > "   * [i386] Drop k7 images."
> > 
> > It would be really great if you would continue to provide k7-images. Would this be possible?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks for all your great work and efforts,
> > Ralf
> 
> the 686 image should just be fine.
> until now nobody came up with a benchmark measurement
> that would show a huge performance diff.
> 
> also we have to many i386 images,
> so i'd guess this bug can be closed soon.

Closing, k7 images have been removed some time ago.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: