Bug#533620: Re-assign 533620 to linux-2.6
Hi Moritz,
I am surprised that the Debian bug submitting program did not automatically attach such a vital bit of information!
I do believe to have upgraded the kernel in the meantime, simply by installing security upgrades, so I am probably no longer running that exact version. Right now, I am running:
2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 26 21:18:21 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
So - it probably was the version that was available on the Debian repositories before this one.
Is there a reliable way of making sure?
The contents of my /boot directory are:
ll /boot/
total 19M
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 2009-06-03 11:20 boot -> .
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 302K 2009-02-18 16:13 coffee.bmp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 84K 2009-07-27 00:46 config-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2009-06-03 11:20 debian.bmp -> /boot/sarge.bmp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 151K 2009-02-18 16:13 debianlilo.bmp
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4.0K 2009-08-06 01:09 grub
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7.5M 2009-08-06 01:09 initrd.img-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7.5M 2009-06-28 08:50 initrd.img-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64.bak
drwx------ 2 root root 16K 2009-06-03 11:17 lost+found
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24K 2009-02-18 16:13 sarge.bmp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24K 2009-02-18 16:13 sid.bmp
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.2M 2009-07-27 00:46 System.map-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1.7M 2009-07-27 00:45 vmlinuz-2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64
Does this mean the previous version was also 2.6.26-2?
Hope this helps!
Rainer
----- "Moritz Muehlenhoff" <jmm@inutil.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:56:00AM +0200, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > reassign 533620 linux-2.6
> > thanks
> >
> > The problem described in bug 533620 is a kernel bug, so I am
> re-assigning it to the
> > linux-2.6 package. What version of the kernel were you running when
> you experienced the crash?
>
> Rainer, which kernel was used?
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
Reply to: