[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#462221: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: No detection of dual core and Kernel Panic)

Your message dated Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:04:08 +0200
with message-id <20090805200408.GA20116@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#462221: linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: No detection of dual, core and Kernel Panic
has caused the Debian Bug report #462221,
regarding linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64: No detection of dual core and Kernel Panic
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
462221: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462221
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.23-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system

Hello, 

I can't upgrade my kernel. Kernels 2.6.20 and above systemacally
provoke a kernel panic. 
I'm using a Hewlett-Packard PC with a dual core. The system seems not
to detect the two procs, start with 1 and fatally crash. 
Here you can find picture of the panic and some informations of my
system (lshw and /proc/cpuinfo) :
http://perso.crans.org/~pessoles/KernelLog/

Thanks for your work.

Regards,

-- 
xabi


-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=POSIX (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64 depends on:
ii  e2fsprogs                    1.40.3-1    ext2 file system utilities and lib
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initr 0.91d       tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools            3.3-pre11-4 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64 recommends no packages.

-- debconf information:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-2.6.23-1-amd64: false
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  shared/kernel-image/really-run-bootloader: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/abort-install-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-has-ramdisk:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/kimage-is-a-directory:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/elilo-initrd-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/bootloader-initrd-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/lilo-initrd-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/bootloader-test-error-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/old-dir-initrd-link-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.23-1-amd64: false
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/overwriting-modules-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/abort-overwrite-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/initrd-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/create-kimage-link-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/old-system-map-link-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/prerm/removing-running-kernel-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/prerm/would-invalidate-boot-loader-2.6.23-1-amd64: true
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/already-running-this-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/preinst/failed-to-move-modules-2.6.23-1-amd64:
  linux-image-2.6.23-1-amd64/postinst/old-initrd-link-2.6.23-1-amd64: true

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:54:35PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 03:15:54PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:31:02PM +0200, Xavier Pessoles wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm so sorry to be such a bad bug reporter.
> > 
> > well we don't have a real acpi maintainer here.
> >  
> > > Anyway,
> > > 
> > > I've upgrade to 2.6.24-1 :
> > 
> > so please test out newer 2.6.25-rc8,
> > if problem persists there please file in bugzilla.kernel.org
> > and let us know the bug number.
> 
> Xavier, is this still reproducible with the 2.6.26 kernel from
> Lenny?

No further feedback, closing the bug.

If anyone reencounters the problem, please reopen this bug.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: