[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#521523: marked as done (it's about time that proper autoloading aliases are added to floppy.ko)



Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:28:43 +0200
with message-id <20090720182842.GA2251@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#521520: udev: floppy not autoloaded anymore
has caused the Debian Bug report #521523,
regarding it's about time that proper autoloading aliases are added to floppy.ko
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
521523: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=521523
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: udev
Version: 0.140-1

Hello,

since 0.140-1 udev does not autoload the floppy module anymore.
Switching back to 0.125-7 fixes this. Since the Debian ChangeLog doesn't
state any change regarding changed behaviour in that direction, I'm not
sure whether this is intentional or not.


regards
   Mario
-- 
There are two major products that come from Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence.    -- Jeremy S. Anderson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.30-1

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 08:23:34PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 07:11:03PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Scott's patch landed in 2.6.30.
> > Mario, can you confirm that this fixes your problem?
> 
> Yes, floppy gets autoloaded in 2.6.30 without an /etc/modules entry.

Thanks, closing the bug then.

Cheers,
        Moritz





















--- End Message ---

Reply to: