[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#523392: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.29-1-486: Bug in drivers/ide/cs5536.c)

Your message dated Sun, 19 Jul 2009 01:27:50 +0200
with message-id <20090718232750.GA22222@galadriel.inutil.org>
and subject line Re: linux-image-2.6.29-1-486: Bug in drivers/ide/cs5536.c
has caused the Debian Bug report #523392,
regarding linux-image-2.6.29-1-486: Bug in drivers/ide/cs5536.c
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
523392: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=523392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-486
Version: 2.6.29-2
Severity: important


Hello,

 I have got this cs5536 bug (with my pcengines alix 2C box) :
 http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123904273731477&w=4

 With the kernel 2.6.28 everything is ok. A patch is provided in the post of the url (I didn't try the patch).

 Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

 drivers/ide/cs5536.c |    1 +
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
@@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static const struct ide_dma_ops cs5536_d
 	.dma_test_irq		= ide_dma_test_irq,
 	.dma_lost_irq		= ide_dma_lost_irq,
 	.dma_timer_expiry	= ide_dma_sff_timer_expiry,
+	.dma_sff_read_status	= ide_dma_sff_read_status,
 };
 
 static const struct ide_port_info cs5536_info = {


Anthony.
 



-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.28-1-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.29-1-486 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]         1.5.26     Debian configuration management sy
ii  initramfs-tools [linux-initra 0.93.2     tools for generating an initramfs
ii  module-init-tools             3.7-pre9-1 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.29-1-486 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.29-1-486 suggests:
ii  grub                          0.97-53    GRand Unified Bootloader (Legacy v
pn  linux-doc-2.6.29              <none>     (no description available)

-- debconf information excluded

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.6.30-1

On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:09:27PM +0200, Anthony PIRON wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.29-1-486
> Version: 2.6.29-2
> Severity: important
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  I have got this cs5536 bug (with my pcengines alix 2C box) :
>  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123904273731477&w=4
> 
>  With the kernel 2.6.28 everything is ok. A patch is provided in the post of the url (I didn't try the patch).
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> 
>  drivers/ide/cs5536.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/ide/cs5536.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ static const struct ide_dma_ops cs5536_d
>  	.dma_test_irq		= ide_dma_test_irq,
>  	.dma_lost_irq		= ide_dma_lost_irq,
>  	.dma_timer_expiry	= ide_dma_sff_timer_expiry,
> +	.dma_sff_read_status	= ide_dma_sff_read_status,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct ide_port_info cs5536_info = {

The patch was merged in 2.6.30, closing the bug. The driver doesn't exist
in the Lenny kernel.

Cheers,
        Moritz

--- End Message ---
Reply to: